

Deformation
Rates Based
on Submerged 18ka Shorelines

Color shaded relief image of Heceta Bank, Oregon
looking to the southeast. EM-300 multibeam data collected by MBARI and
NOAA PMEL/Newport. Rough bank top is exposed Miocene strata. Note
smooth wave-cut platform surrounding the bank at a depth of 100-150 m.
Modern rates
of active deformation have thus far been based mainly on the tectonic
geomorphology
of subaerial landforms. However, the world's principal plate boundaries
are mostly located offshore, making such studies difficult at many
active continental margins.
However,
sidescan
sonar, swath bathymetry, high-resolution seismic reflection profiling,
and submersible observations
allow the
mapping of deformed stream channels, abrasion platforms, and submerged
lowstand shorelines, leading
to the
determination
of deformation rates. We have previously used sidescan sonar imagery,
seismic
reflection profiles, and dated piston cores to determine Holocene slip
rates of several left-lateral strike-slip faults on the Juan de Fuca (JDF) plate, immediately
west of the Cascadia deformation front off Oregon and Washington. These
faults offset the baseof-slope channel; their slip rates are determined
from offset isopachs of landward thickening Pleistocene submarine fan
deposits,
and from surficial offset of dated channels. Recently, we have
discovered
a late Pleistocene lowstand shoreline rimming three major submarine
banks
along the outer shelf off Oregon. 
In 1993-95, we
investigated this shoreline with AMS 150 kHz sidescan sonar and the
DELTA
submersible and found spectacular shoreline features, including barrier
islands, estuaries, and headlands. The preservation of these ephemeral
features attests to the very rapid rise of sealevel at the close of the
Pleistocene. Submarine traverses found pholad borings, oxidized cross stratified sands,
and shallow-water fossil debris at the base of beach cliffs. We also
conducted
sidescan and submersible traverses across Nehalem and Coquille banks
and
found similar features. Coquille Bank, in fact, was formerly an
island. Datable intertidal fossils like the
barnacles at right indicate the age of last submergence of the latest
glacial shoreling at 14-18 ka.
Shoreline
angles
were originally horizontal and close to sea level. Now these shoreline
angles are warped and faulted, locally to depths of 200-300 m, deeper
than
the Wisconsin lowstand of -120 m, indicating that the shoreline angles
reflect vertical tectonics rather than eustatic sea level change. Two
of
the major submarine banks, Heceta and Nehalem, are strongly tilted to the south (margin
parallel),
and deformed by faults and folds, while the third appears relatively
undeformed.
The submerged shoreline is
at about
the depth of the lowstand at the north ends of these two blocks, while
the south ends are deeper,
indicating overall
subsidence
of these blocks. Both banks are known to have been uplifted
approximately
1 km since the Miocene, so
the recent
subsidence
could reflect one of many vertical fluctuations, or a significant
change
in margin tectonics. Subsidence of the banks may be due to
gravitational
collapse or tectonic erosion of the margin, despite the presence of an
accreting prism of sediments to
the west.
The deformation
of the outer shelf can be tied directly to uplift rates onshore
determined
with geodetic techniques and tide
gauges, as well as
deformation
of marine terraces. We hope these data will help us to identify
along-strike
variability that may
indicate segmentation of
the Cascadia plate boundary.
Back to the
Active Tectonics Home Page